Regina v McGarrity [1999] NSWCCA 73
The appeal was allowed partially because, although the sentence length was within range, insufficient weight was given to the 13-year gap in offending, which warranted a longer period of parole supervision under special circumstances than originally imposed.
- Parties
- Crown: Regina; Applicant: Kevin Robert Douglas McGarrity
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Determination of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentence, Larceny as Servant, Special Circumstances, Parole Supervision, Manifestly Excessive Sentence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Crown
Kevin Robert Douglas McGarrity
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence, Determination of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge gave sufficient weight to the applicant's voluntary surrender
- 3 Whether a 13-year gap in offending should have led to a finding of special circumstances for parole supervision
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed partially because, although the sentence length was within range, insufficient weight was given to the 13-year gap in offending, which warranted a longer period of parole supervision under special circumstances than originally imposed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal granted
- Appeal allowed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment