ST ALDER v WAVERLEY [2009] NSWCA 437
The applicants should not be removed from the relevant area except in accordance with s 159 of the Crown Lands Act 1989 (NSW), given the statutory requirement for a warrant for removal, and in light of the ongoing occupation and approaching holiday period, a stay should be continued pending the substantive hearing of the appeal.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kevin St Alder; First Respondent: Waverley Council; Second Respondent: State of New South Wales
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted for extension of stay; interim injunction restraining removal of applicants until 18 February 2010; directions for appeal preparation and submissions; costs of motion considered as costs in the proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Continuation of Stay, Removal From Crown Land, Representative Proceedings, Interlocutory Orders, Appeals Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kevin St Alder
Applicant
Waverley Council
First Respondent
State of New South Wales
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Extension of Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a continued stay of summary dismissal should be granted to applicants occupying Crown Land
- 2 Whether the applicants have any arguable entitlement to remain in occupation of the Crown Land under lease, licence, estoppel, or fiduciary duty
- 3 Whether the statutory regime of the Crown Lands Act 1989 (NSW) precludes the applicants' asserted entitlement to remain
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants should not be removed from the relevant area except in accordance with s 159 of the Crown Lands Act 1989 (NSW), given the statutory requirement for a warrant for removal, and in light of the ongoing occupation and approaching holiday period, a stay should be continued pending the substantive hearing of the appeal.
Court Disposition
Application granted for extension of stay; interim injunction restraining removal of applicants until 18 February 2010; directions for appeal preparation and submissions; costs of motion considered as costs in the proceedings.
Orders
- Applicants undertook to maintain cleanliness and keep fire exit clear; respondents restrained until 5pm 18 February 2010 from removing applicants or their belongings or preventing access to area under colonnade at northwest rear of Bondi Pavilion, subject to exceptions for emergency services.
- Appeal and any application for leave to appeal fixed for hearing on 18 February 2010.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment