Walley, Kevin v The State of Western Australia & Ors Taylor, Johnson v The State of Western Australia & Ors Collard, Donald & Anor v The State of Western Australia & Ors Smith, Clarrie v The State of Western Australia & Ors [1996] FCA 490
Compliance by the Government party with the obligation to negotiate in good faith under s.31(1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is a condition precedent to making an application to the Tribunal under s.35 for a determination; accordingly, if such compliance has not occurred, the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to determine the application and must dismiss it.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Administrative Law—application for Judicial Review / First Instance—federal Court Judgment on Orders of Review
- Outcome
- Third respondent's (Tribunal's) decision set aside; matters remitted for re-determination; costs awarded as specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['obligation to Negotiate in Good Faith' 'condition Precedent for Tribunal Application' 'future Act Determination Under Native Title Act' 'procedural Requirements for Mining Lease Grants']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Administrative Law—application for Judicial Review / First Instance—federal Court Judgment on Orders of Review
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether compliance by Government party with obligation to negotiate in good faith under s.31(1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is a condition precedent to application under s.35 for a Tribunal determination;' 'Whether the National Native Title Tribunal may proceed to determine an application if the Government party has not negotiated in good faith;' 'Whether the Tribunal can dismiss such an application on grounds of failure to negotiate in good faith.']
Ratio Decidendi
Compliance by the Government party with the obligation to negotiate in good faith under s.31(1)(b) of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is a condition precedent to making an application to the Tribunal under s.35 for a determination; accordingly, if such compliance has not occurred, the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to determine the application and must dismiss it.
Court Disposition
Third respondent's (Tribunal's) decision set aside; matters remitted for re-determination; costs awarded as specified.
Orders
- ["Tribunal's decisions to refuse applicants' applications for dismissal of Government party's s.35 applications set aside in each proceeding." 'Each matter remitted to the Tribunal for re-determination in accordance with law.' "In WAG 6004 and WAG 6005, first and second respondents to pay applicant's costs." "In WAG...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment