Waters v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 679
The amended employment imputation was encompassed by the corruption imputation and would add nothing if the corruption imputation were found to be conveyed; therefore imputations 5(b) and 5(a) were allowed as alternatives.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Ruling on Amendment to Imputation 5(a) and Whether Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) Differ in Substance
- Outcome
- Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) allowed as alternatives.
- Legal Topics
- ['defamatory Imputations' 'amendment of Imputations' 'alternative Imputations']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling on Amendment to Imputation 5(a) and Whether Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) Differ in Substance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether amended imputation 5(a) differed in substance from imputation 5(b).' 'Whether imputations 5(b) and 5(a) should be allowed as alternatives.']
Ratio Decidendi
The amended employment imputation was encompassed by the corruption imputation and would add nothing if the corruption imputation were found to be conveyed; therefore imputations 5(b) and 5(a) were allowed as alternatives.
Court Disposition
Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) allowed as alternatives.
Orders
- ['Allow imputations 5(b) and 5(a) as alternatives.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment