Waters v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 679

Waters v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 679

The amended employment imputation was encompassed by the corruption imputation and would add nothing if the corruption imputation were found to be conveyed; therefore imputations 5(b) and 5(a) were allowed as alternatives.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Ruling on Amendment to Imputation 5(a) and Whether Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) Differ in Substance
Outcome
Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) allowed as alternatives.
Legal Topics
['defamatory Imputations' 'amendment of Imputations' 'alternative Imputations']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Defamation / Ruling on Amendment to Imputation 5(a) and Whether Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) Differ in Substance

  1. 1 ['Whether amended imputation 5(a) differed in substance from imputation 5(b).' 'Whether imputations 5(b) and 5(a) should be allowed as alternatives.']

Ratio Decidendi

The amended employment imputation was encompassed by the corruption imputation and would add nothing if the corruption imputation were found to be conveyed; therefore imputations 5(b) and 5(a) were allowed as alternatives.

Court Disposition

Imputations 5(b) and 5(a) allowed as alternatives.

Orders

  • ['Allow imputations 5(b) and 5(a) as alternatives.']