Warby v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 173
The applicant pleaded guilty only to the offence under s 323 of the Crimes Act 1900, but was sentenced under s 324, which constitutes a distinct and greater offence requiring specific allegation in the indictment. Sentencing on the basis of the aggravated offence was an error requiring the sentence to be quashed and re-imposed according to the offence actually pleaded.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, sentence quashed and re-imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'influencing Witnesses' 'circumstances of Aggravation' 'available Maximum Sentence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant was sentenced for an aggravated offence contrary to his plea of guilty to the non-aggravated offence' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant pleaded guilty only to the offence under s 323 of the Crimes Act 1900, but was sentenced under s 324, which constitutes a distinct and greater offence requiring specific allegation in the indictment. Sentencing on the basis of the aggravated offence was an error requiring the sentence to be quashed and re-imposed according to the offence actually pleaded.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, sentence quashed and re-imposed
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal upheld' 'Sentence is quashed' 'In lieu, the applicant is sentenced to imprisonment for a non parole period of 12 months commencing on 18 August 2006 and expiring on 17 August 2007 with a balance of term of 4 months commencing on 18 August 2007' 'The Court directs the release of the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment