Kochai v R [2023] NSWCCA 116
The sentencing judge identified and considered all relevant factors bearing upon the objective seriousness of the offending and was not required to assign a descriptor or point on a scale; no error is shown in the assessment of seriousness. The aggregate sentence imposed does not exceed the unifying principles or available range having regard to the facts, degree of involvement, and significance of the criminality. No manifest excess is established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Hearing of Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'objective Seriousness' 'manifest Excess' 'aggregate Sentencing' 'totality Principle']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Hearing of Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge failed to assess the objective seriousness of the offending conduct.' 'Whether the aggregate sentence imposed was manifestly excessive.']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge identified and considered all relevant factors bearing upon the objective seriousness of the offending and was not required to assign a descriptor or point on a scale; no error is shown in the assessment of seriousness. The aggregate sentence imposed does not exceed the unifying principles or available range having regard to the facts, degree of involvement, and significance of the criminality. No manifest excess is established.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is granted.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment