KHOURY v FITZ-GIBBON [1989] NSWCA 124
The construction of the partnership and settlement deeds did not permit the goodwill valuation to be attacked on the ground that it failed to deduct the value of clients taken by the outgoing partner, nor did the valuation improperly address the practice rather than goodwill. There was no single 'sum' whose ascertainment was required before payment of the respondent's share of goodwill. The valuation stands; the appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Khoury; Respondent: Fitz-Gibbon
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 1989
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Dissolution of Partnership, Goodwill Valuation, Interpretation of Partnership Deeds
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khoury
Appellant
Fitz-Gibbon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the valuation of goodwill was properly conducted under the partnership deed and settlement deed.
- 2 Whether the valuer valued goodwill or the practice as a whole.
- 3 Whether any amount was payable under the relevant clause on dissolution or if the respondent's action was premature.
Ratio Decidendi
The construction of the partnership and settlement deeds did not permit the goodwill valuation to be attacked on the ground that it failed to deduct the value of clients taken by the outgoing partner, nor did the valuation improperly address the practice rather than goodwill. There was no single 'sum' whose ascertainment was required before payment of the respondent's share of goodwill. The valuation stands; the appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The parties are to bring in, within 14 days, short minutes of order to be made in light of dismissal of appeal and finalisation of other proceedings.
- The orders are to provide that the appellant pay the respondent's costs of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment