Akbar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 515
Sections 104 and 105 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) do not permit a visa applicant to change the nominated skilled occupation after application lodgement; such changes are not a correction of an incorrect answer within the meaning of these provisions, nor are they 'additional relevant information' under s 55. The proper course is to withdraw and lodge a new application. The appeal must be dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Khurram Akbar; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Subclass 485 Visa, Nominated Skilled Occupation, Notification of Change in Circumstances, Judicial Review, Legitimate Expectation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khurram Akbar
Appellant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a visa applicant may change the nominated skilled occupation after lodgement but before decision
- 2 Interpretation of ss 54, 55, 104, and 105 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) in the context of supplying new or corrected answers
- 3 Whether Form 1022 creates a legitimate expectation that changes to nominated skilled occupation will be considered
Ratio Decidendi
Sections 104 and 105 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) do not permit a visa applicant to change the nominated skilled occupation after application lodgement; such changes are not a correction of an incorrect answer within the meaning of these provisions, nor are they 'additional relevant information' under s 55. The proper course is to withdraw and lodge a new application. The appeal must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal be dismissed.
- Each party bear its own costs of and incidental to this appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment