Kwon v Cha; Kwon v O’Neill [2015] NSWCA 111

Kwon v Cha; Kwon v O’Neill [2015] NSWCA 111

No error was demonstrated in the primary judge's summary dismissal of proceedings and refusal of leave for caveats and subpoenas. The claims disclosed no reasonable cause of action, no caveatable interest, and the oral agreements for transfer of land were unenforceable under s 54A of the Conveyancing Act. Leave to appeal should be refused as the appeals were doomed to fail.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 April 2015
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decisions (summary Dismissal and Related Orders)
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused with costs in both proceedings.
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal' 'summary Dismissal' 'caveats' 'specific Performance' 'interlocutory Decisions']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decisions (summary Dismissal and Related Orders)

  1. 1 ['Whether primary judge erred in summarily dismissing proceedings and refusing extension of caveats' 'Whether orders refusing leave to file further motions or issue subpoenas were affected by error' "Whether there was evidence of a caveatable or proprietary interest to support Ms Kwon's claims" 'Whether the alleged oral agreements were enforceable']

Ratio Decidendi

No error was demonstrated in the primary judge's summary dismissal of proceedings and refusal of leave for caveats and subpoenas. The claims disclosed no reasonable cause of action, no caveatable interest, and the oral agreements for transfer of land were unenforceable under s 54A of the Conveyancing Act. Leave to appeal should be refused as the appeals were doomed to fail.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused with costs in both proceedings.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal refused.' "Applicant to pay respondents' costs in both proceedings."]