Wang v Sydney City Council [2007] NSWLEC 518

Wang v Sydney City Council [2007] NSWLEC 518

The height of the proposed fence is excessive and uncharacteristic of the area, resulting in unacceptable impacts of bulk and scale on the adjoining property. Alternate solutions exist to mitigate noise and privacy impacts without adverse amenity impact. The proposal does not satisfy local planning controls and must be refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; development application refused
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'dividing Fence' 'bulk and Scale' 'amenity Impacts' 'privacy' 'noise Mitigation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the proposed fence would have an unacceptable impact on the adjoining property, particularly in relation to its height, bulk and scale' 'Whether the fence is required to mitigate the impacts of development arising from the adjoining property (noise, privacy, amenity)']

Ratio Decidendi

The height of the proposed fence is excessive and uncharacteristic of the area, resulting in unacceptable impacts of bulk and scale on the adjoining property. Alternate solutions exist to mitigate noise and privacy impacts without adverse amenity impact. The proposal does not satisfy local planning controls and must be refused.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; development application refused

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The development application (D2006/00391) to construct a dividing fence at 70 Glebe Point Road, Glebe, is refused.' 'The Exhibits are retained.']