Kidman Resources Limited, in the matter of Kidman Resources Limited (No 2) [2019] FCA 1513
The Court approved the Scheme because the convening orders had been complied with, the Scheme Meeting was duly held, the Scheme resolution was passed by the requisite statutory majorities, relevant conditions precedent were satisfied, ASIC stated it had no objection, the Scheme was supported by shareholders and the independent expert, there was no competing proposal or relevant objection, disclosure was adequate, and nothing suggested bad faith, oppression, or any matter requiring refusal of approval. The Court also exempted Kidman from compliance with s 411(11).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Members' Scheme of Arrangement Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Second Court Hearing / Approval Hearing
- Outcome
- Scheme approved; exemption from s 411(11) granted; orders entered forthwith.
- Legal Topics
- ["members' Scheme of Arrangement" 'approval of Scheme of Arrangement' 'asic No Objection Statement' 'exemption From Compliance With S 411(11)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Members' Scheme of Arrangement Under S 411 of the Corporations Act 2001 (cth) / Second Court Hearing / Approval Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should approve the Scheme pursuant to s 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).' 'Whether Kidman Resources Limited should be exempted from compliance with s 411(11) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to s 411(12).']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court approved the Scheme because the convening orders had been complied with, the Scheme Meeting was duly held, the Scheme resolution was passed by the requisite statutory majorities, relevant conditions precedent were satisfied, ASIC stated it had no objection, the Scheme was supported by shareholders and the independent expert, there was no competing proposal or relevant objection, disclosure was adequate, and nothing suggested bad faith, oppression, or any matter requiring refusal of approval. The Court also exempted Kidman from compliance with s 411(11).
Court Disposition
Scheme approved; exemption from s 411(11) granted; orders entered forthwith.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to subsection 411(4)(b) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), the Scheme of Arrangement between the Plaintiff and its members agreed to by the said members at the meeting held on 5 September 2019 (the terms of which are as set out in Annexure A to these Orders) (Scheme) be and is hereby approved.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment