Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd v The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing & Allied Services Union of Australia & Anor [1998] FCA 559
The certified agreement, properly construed, excepted from its application work at sites with a total project value in excess of $56.2 million or where a more advantageous Union site agreement applied; in those circumstances, the agreement did not apply, s 170MN was not engaged, and the Union and its officers and members were not prohibited from engaging in industrial action in support of claims for new site agreements.
- Parties
- Applicant: Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd; First Respondent: The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia; Second Respondent: Kevin Harkins
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Penalty and Injunction Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certified Agreements, Industrial Action, Interpretation of Enterprise Agreements, Workplace Relations Act 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kilpatrick Green Pty Ltd
Applicant
The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia
First Respondent
Kevin Harkins
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Penalty and Injunction Under the Workplace Relations Act 1996 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents contravened s 170MN of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 by engaging in prohibited industrial action while a certified agreement was in force.
- 2 Proper construction of the application clause of the Kilpatrick Green Enterprise Agreement 1997-2000.
Ratio Decidendi
The certified agreement, properly construed, excepted from its application work at sites with a total project value in excess of $56.2 million or where a more advantageous Union site agreement applied; in those circumstances, the agreement did not apply, s 170MN was not engaged, and the Union and its officers and members were not prohibited from engaging in industrial action in support of claims for new site agreements.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The amended application be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment