Bolitho v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2009] NSWSC 580
Damages are an adequate remedy and the balance of convenience favours allowing the settlement to proceed, especially as the plaintiff made no offer to pay into court the debt, and purchasers were bona fide without notice. Thus, no interlocutory injunction will be granted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Ex Tempore Judgment on Notice of Motion
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['injunctions' 'mortgagee Sale of Land' 'bona Fide Purchaser' 'adequacy of Damages' 'balance of Convenience']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Injunction / Ex Tempore Judgment on Notice of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an interlocutory injunction should be granted restraining the registration of a transfer of title after mortgagee sale' 'Whether the sale was at a significant undervalue and tainted by fraud or collusion' 'Whether damages are an adequate remedy and balance of convenience favours the applicant']
Ratio Decidendi
Damages are an adequate remedy and the balance of convenience favours allowing the settlement to proceed, especially as the plaintiff made no offer to pay into court the debt, and purchasers were bona fide without notice. Thus, no interlocutory injunction will be granted.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['Notice of motion dismissed' 'Summons dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment