McKenzie v Cash Converters International Ltd (No 2) [2018] FCA 487

Applicant enjoyed no success as against Cash Converters and has not provided cogent reason to depart from general rule; therefore applicant should pay respondents' costs of interlocutory application.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 11 April 2018
Procedural Posture: Interlocutory Application / Costs Determination
Outcome: Applicant ordered to pay respondents' costs of the interlocutory application.
Legal Topics: ['costs' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'document Production']

['commercial Law' 'corporations Law'] ['costs' 'legal Professional Privilege' 'document Production']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application / Costs Determination

Legal Issues

1 ["Whether applicant should pay respondents' costs on interlocutory application" 'Appropriate costs order in light of partial success']

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant enjoyed no success as against Cash Converters and has not provided cogent reason to depart from general rule; therefore applicant should pay respondents' costs of interlocutory application.

Court Disposition

Applicant ordered to pay respondents' costs of the interlocutory application.

Orders

["The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the interlocutory application filed on 23 December 2016."]