McLennan v Antonios [2014] NSWDC 78
On the balance of probabilities, the plaintiff did not follow Mr Tran's car through the intersection but stopped before turning right while the lights changed from green to amber to red. The first defendant was found to have sped through a red light and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff established liability, no contributory negligence was established, and damages were awarded as quantified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- ['motor Vehicle Accident' 'conflicting Evidence' 'tendency Evidence' 'admissibility of Evidence' 'quantum of Damages' 'contributory Negligence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the first defendant was liable for damages for injuries arising out of a motor vehicle collision' "Whether evidence of the first defendant's poor prior driving record was admissible as tendency evidence" 'Whether the plaintiff was contributorily negligent' 'Assessment of quantum of damages']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of probabilities, the plaintiff did not follow Mr Tran's car through the intersection but stopped before turning right while the lights changed from green to amber to red. The first defendant was found to have sped through a red light and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle. The plaintiff established liability, no contributory negligence was established, and damages were awarded as quantified.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- ['Judgment for the plaintiff for $11,802.' 'Costs reserved.' 'Liberty to restore in 28 days.' 'Exhibits retained for 28 days.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment