Maxwell v Murphy [1957] HCA 7

Maxwell v Murphy [1957] HCA 7

The amending Act, which extended the limitation period from twelve months to six years, does not operate retrospectively to revive causes of action that were already barred under the old limitation period. The appellant’s right to sue had expired before the amendment, and there was no sufficient indication in the statute to displace the presumption against retrospective operation, nor to revive a substantive right or impose on the respondent a liability that no longer existed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['limitation of Actions' 'retrospective Operation of Statutes' 'compensation to Relatives Act' 'fatal Accidents']
['statutory Interpretation' 'tort Law'] ['limitation of Actions' 'retrospective Operation of Statutes' 'compensation to Relatives Act' 'fatal Accidents']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an action under the Compensation to Relatives Act (NSW) can be maintained in respect of a death that occurred more than twelve months before the limitation period was extended from twelve months to six years by the 1953 amending Act.' 'Whether the amendment to the limitation period operates retrospectively to revive rights of action that were already barred under the old limitation period.']

Ratio Decidendi

The amending Act, which extended the limitation period from twelve months to six years, does not operate retrospectively to revive causes of action that were already barred under the old limitation period. The appellant’s right to sue had expired before the amendment, and there was no sufficient indication in the statute to displace the presumption against retrospective operation, nor to revive a substantive right or impose on the respondent a liability that no longer existed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['Appeal dismissed with costs.']