R v KJW [2002] NSWCCA 107

R v KJW [2002] NSWCCA 107

The sentencing judge correctly characterised the offences as objectively very serious, took account of the applicant's subjective circumstances and rehabilitation prospects, allowed a 25 percent discount, and made no error of principle or fact. Rehabilitation was only one sentencing consideration, and the sentences were not shown to be outside the permissible range or manifestly excessive.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentences / Court of Criminal Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['aggravated Indecent Assault' 'aggravated Sexual Assault' 'manifest Excess' 'rehabilitation' 'deterrence' 'guilty Plea Discount']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentences / Court of Criminal Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge erred in the sentencing procedure in the District Court.' 'Whether the sentences imposed were manifestly excessive.' "Whether the applicant's rehabilitation and treatment needs warranted a substantial reduction in the sentences."]

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge correctly characterised the offences as objectively very serious, took account of the applicant's subjective circumstances and rehabilitation prospects, allowed a 25 percent discount, and made no error of principle or fact. Rehabilitation was only one sentencing consideration, and the sentences were not shown to be outside the permissible range or manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']