KK by her tutor Denis Mockler v Bowen (No. 7) [2023] NSWSC 912
Suppression and non-publication orders were necessary as publication of the decisions, even in redacted form, was likely to exacerbate the plaintiff’s serious psychiatric condition and thereby threaten her safety.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Procedural Ruling on Suppression Orders
- Outcome
- Suppression and non-publication orders made as necessary to protect the safety of a person for 50 years.
- Legal Topics
- ['suppression and Non Publication Orders' 'protection of Safety' 'psychiatric Condition and Publication']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Civil / Procedural Ruling on Suppression Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a suppression and non-publication order is necessary to protect the safety of the plaintiff']
Ratio Decidendi
Suppression and non-publication orders were necessary as publication of the decisions, even in redacted form, was likely to exacerbate the plaintiff’s serious psychiatric condition and thereby threaten her safety.
Court Disposition
Suppression and non-publication orders made as necessary to protect the safety of a person for 50 years.
Orders
- ['The judgments of Lonergan J in these proceedings are suppressed pursuant to s 7 of the Court Suppression and Non-publication Orders Act 2010 (NSW), upon the ground that the order is necessary to protect the safety of a person pursuant to s 8(1)(c), and that order is to remain in place for 50 years.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment