Environment Protection Authority v Knight Frank (NSW) Pty Ltd [1999] NSWLEC 118
The Court held that the Registrar had power under the Land and Environment Court Rules to grant leave for the notice to produce to be returnable prior to the hearing, and that the notices to produce in question bore sufficient indication of such leave by court seal and endorsement; therefore, the prosecutor had the necessary leave to issue the notices to produce.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Environment Protection Authority; Defendant: Knight Frank (NSW) Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application Regarding Notice to Produce in Pre Trial Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application granted; leave for the notice to produce affirmed
- Legal Topics
- Notice to Produce, Court Leave, Pre Trial Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Environment Protection Authority
Prosecutor
Knight Frank (NSW) Pty Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application Regarding Notice to Produce in Pre Trial Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave of the Court is required for the issue of a notice to produce prior to hearing date under Pt 36 r 16 of the Supreme Court Rules
- 2 Whether the Registrar had authority to grant leave for the notices to produce
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the Registrar had power under the Land and Environment Court Rules to grant leave for the notice to produce to be returnable prior to the hearing, and that the notices to produce in question bore sufficient indication of such leave by court seal and endorsement; therefore, the prosecutor had the necessary leave to issue the notices to produce.
Court Disposition
Application granted; leave for the notice to produce affirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment