R v KO [2024] NSWSC 679
Section 22C of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) did not apply because the earlier alleged offence was an attempt to commit a serious breaking and entering offence and was agreed not to be a relevant offence. Applying the unacceptable risk test, although the allegations, especially the dangerous driving of a stolen vehicle, created serious bail concerns, those concerns did not rise to an unacceptable risk when balanced against the applicant's age, lack of prior convictions, difficult custody experience, strong family supervision, proposed engagement with school, PCYC and Youth Justice, and the likelihood that a custodial sentence would be unlikely if convicted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Release Application Pursuant to S 49 of the Bail Act 2013 (nsw) / Bail Application
- Outcome
- Bail granted with conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['release Application' 'young Person' 'bail Act 2013 (nsw), S 22 C' 'relevant Offences' 'unacceptable Risk Test' 'attempted Break and Enter' 'motor Theft Offence']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Release Application Pursuant to S 49 of the Bail Act 2013 (nsw) / Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether s 22C of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) applied to the applicant's release application." 'Whether the attempted aggravated break, enter and steal charge was a relevant offence for the purposes of s 22C of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW).' 'Whether, applying the unacceptable risk test under s 19 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW), bail should be refused.' "Whether conditions and the applicant's personal circumstances sufficiently ameliorated bail concerns."]
Ratio Decidendi
Section 22C of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW) did not apply because the earlier alleged offence was an attempt to commit a serious breaking and entering offence and was agreed not to be a relevant offence. Applying the unacceptable risk test, although the allegations, especially the dangerous driving of a stolen vehicle, created serious bail concerns, those concerns did not rise to an unacceptable risk when balanced against the applicant's age, lack of prior convictions, difficult custody experience, strong family supervision, proposed engagement with school, PCYC and Youth Justice, and the likelihood that a custodial sentence would be unlikely if convicted.
Court Disposition
Bail granted with conditions.
Orders
- ['Bail is granted with conditions.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment