David v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1995] FCA 807
The Tribunal breached procedural fairness by failing to inform the applicant or provide an opportunity to comment on information about political developments in Sri Lanka and the feasibility of relocation, both of which were decisive to the determination; therefore, the decision was set aside and the matter remitted.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Application allowed; Tribunal decision set aside and matter remitted.
- Legal Topics
- ['procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'refugee Status Determination' 'right to Be Heard']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Set Aside Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness by relying on political developments and relocation prospects without providing an opportunity to comment']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal breached procedural fairness by failing to inform the applicant or provide an opportunity to comment on information about political developments in Sri Lanka and the feasibility of relocation, both of which were decisive to the determination; therefore, the decision was set aside and the matter remitted.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; Tribunal decision set aside and matter remitted.
Orders
- ['The decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal dated 10 March 1995 in relation to the appeal of Komathi David be set aside.' 'The matter be remitted to the Tribunal for further determination.' "The Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs to pay the applicant's costs of this proceeding."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment