Koskiusko Alpine Club Limited v. National Parks And Wildlife Service [1988] NSWLEC 168
There is a serious question as to the lawfulness of the approval granted without requiring an environmental impact statement, and erecting any buildings could prejudice or fetter the statutory functions of the first respondent. The interlocutory orders restraining construction should not be varied pending the final determination of the matter.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 1988
- Procedural Posture
- Motion / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Motion dismissed. Interlocutory restraint remains.
- Legal Topics
- ['building Approval' 'environmental Impact Statement' 'jurisdiction' 'interlocutory Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Motion / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether building approval was granted lawfully under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 and Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1974' 'Whether the erection of the buildings should be restrained pending resolution of alleged breaches of statutory duties']
Ratio Decidendi
There is a serious question as to the lawfulness of the approval granted without requiring an environmental impact statement, and erecting any buildings could prejudice or fetter the statutory functions of the first respondent. The interlocutory orders restraining construction should not be varied pending the final determination of the matter.
Court Disposition
Motion dismissed. Interlocutory restraint remains.
Orders
- ['Motion dismissed.' "Liberty to apply on two days' notice." 'Costs to be reserved.' 'Exhibits may be released.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment