R V KRC [2000] NSWCCA 541

R V KRC [2000] NSWCCA 541

The applicant produced no credible evidence supporting his claim that the pleas of guilty should be set aside or that a miscarriage of justice occurred. The admissions to multiple parties, the records of interview, written instructions to counsel, and affidavits from solicitors and counsel confirmed the integrity of the pleas and convictions. The sentencing judge took into account all relevant factors and no error of principle or exercise of discretion was shown. Thus, both the conviction and sentence appeals were dismissed.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Applicant: KRC
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 November 2000
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave granted to appeal against sentence but sentence appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Guilty Plea Withdrawal, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Sexual Offences Guilty Plea Withdrawal Sentencing Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 23 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

KRC

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conviction should be set aside notwithstanding a guilty plea
  2. 2 Whether there was a miscarriage of justice in entering a guilty plea
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed by the District Court was appropriate

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant produced no credible evidence supporting his claim that the pleas of guilty should be set aside or that a miscarriage of justice occurred. The admissions to multiple parties, the records of interview, written instructions to counsel, and affidavits from solicitors and counsel confirmed the integrity of the pleas and convictions. The sentencing judge took into account all relevant factors and no error of principle or exercise of discretion was shown. Thus, both the conviction and sentence appeals were dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; leave granted to appeal against sentence but sentence appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • Appeal against conviction dismissed.
  • Leave to appeal against sentence granted but appeal dismissed.