Regina v Carter [2001] NSWCCA 245

Regina v Carter [2001] NSWCCA 245

It was an error to discount only 15% for the early guilty plea by reference to strength of the Crown case, and an error to combine sentences before considering totality instead of sentencing separately for each offence and addressing totality via concurrency. The sentence for the second count was manifestly excessive and should be reimposed in accordance with the correct principles.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 June 2001
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sentences quashed; applicant re-sentenced.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'discount for Plea of Guilty' 'totality Principle' 'application of Pearce V the Queen']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'discount for Plea of Guilty' 'totality Principle' 'application of Pearce V the Queen']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred in applying only a 15% discount for the applicant's early plea of guilty" 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in the approach to totality and accumulation of sentences' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

It was an error to discount only 15% for the early guilty plea by reference to strength of the Crown case, and an error to combine sentences before considering totality instead of sentencing separately for each offence and addressing totality via concurrency. The sentence for the second count was manifestly excessive and should be reimposed in accordance with the correct principles.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sentences quashed; applicant re-sentenced.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Sentences imposed by Acting Judge Nash quashed.' 'On the first count: applicant sentenced to a fixed term of 2 years imprisonment from 20 May 2000 to 19 May 2002.' 'On the second count: applicant sentenced to 4 years imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years and...