Xu v Ku-ring-gai Council [2024] NSWLEC 1219
As all relevant planning requirements and jurisdictional considerations are satisfied, and parties have agreed to the terms, the Court is required to grant consent subject to agreed conditions.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Development Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'alterations and Additions' 'appeal' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between Parties']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Development Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the amended development application should be granted consent' 'Compliance with Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan 2015' 'Compliance with BASIX requirements' 'Consideration of environmental and planning impacts']
Ratio Decidendi
As all relevant planning requirements and jurisdictional considerations are satisfied, and parties have agreed to the terms, the Court is required to grant consent subject to agreed conditions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development application number DA0340/22, as amended, for alterations and additions, including an upper floor addition, detached carport, swimming pool and associated works, for Lot 651 in Deposited Plan 752031, known as 14 Canberra Crescent, East Lindfield, is determined by the grant of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment