Parsonage v Ku-ring-gai Council [2016] NSWLEC 1400
Orders were made to give effect to an agreement reached between the parties at a conciliation conference, in accordance with s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. The court was satisfied that the agreement was one that could be made in a proper exercise of its functions.
- Parties
- Applicants: Stephen Parsonage and Kate Parsonage; Respondent: Ku-ring-gai Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; applicant granted leave to amend application; applicant to pay specified costs to Council.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application, Conciliation Conference, Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Parsonage and Kate Parsonage
Applicants
Ku-ring-gai Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 / Post Conciliation Conference Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreement reached between the parties at conciliation may be given effect as a court order under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
Orders were made to give effect to an agreement reached between the parties at a conciliation conference, in accordance with s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979. The court was satisfied that the agreement was one that could be made in a proper exercise of its functions.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; applicant granted leave to amend application; applicant to pay specified costs to Council.
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to amend its development application in accordance with the plans and documents specified in condition 1 of Attachment 'A'.
- The applicant to pay the Council's costs that are thrown away as a result of amending the application in the amount of $5,000 including GST.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment