R v Stanley [2004] NSWCCA 278

R v Stanley [2004] NSWCCA 278

Given the way the defence was conducted, and absent any explicit request or direction sought at trial regarding dock identification, the trial judge's summing up was adequate and there was no miscarriage of justice resulting from the absence of a further warning; thus, the appeal should be dismissed.

Parties
Crown: Regina; Appellant: Kurt Frederick Stanley
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 August 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Summing Up, Dock Identification, Jury Directions, Identification Evidence
Criminal Law Summing Up Dock Identification Jury Directions Identification Evidence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Crown

Kurt Frederick Stanley

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's directions to the jury on identification were adequate, particularly regarding the dangers of identification in the circumstances (dock identification).

Ratio Decidendi

Given the way the defence was conducted, and absent any explicit request or direction sought at trial regarding dock identification, the trial judge's summing up was adequate and there was no miscarriage of justice resulting from the absence of a further warning; thus, the appeal should be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.