Tham v R [2020] NSWCCA 338
The applicant's status as an unlawful non-citizen was inextricably linked to the social security fraud offences because the benefits were payable only to an Australian resident and he used a false Australian citizenship identity to meet the eligibility criteria; this demonstrated planning and sophistication and was relevant to objective seriousness. Given the significant amount fraudulently obtained, the extended period, the premeditated and sophisticated use of a false identity, cessation only on arrest, and the breach of trust inherent in the claims, the sentencing judge's assessment that counts 3 and 4 were well above the middle range and moving towards the upper end was reasonably open.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted; leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentence Appeal' 'objective Seriousness' 'social Security Fraud' 'passport Offences' 'unlawful Non Citizen' 'financial Advantage by Deception']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge erred by taking into account the applicant's status as an unlawful non-citizen when assessing the objective seriousness of the social security fraud offences." 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in finding that the social security fraud offences were well above the mid-range and moving towards the upper end of the scale of objective seriousness.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's status as an unlawful non-citizen was inextricably linked to the social security fraud offences because the benefits were payable only to an Australian resident and he used a false Australian citizenship identity to meet the eligibility criteria; this demonstrated planning and sophistication and was relevant to objective seriousness. Given the significant amount fraudulently obtained, the extended period, the premeditated and sophisticated use of a false identity, cessation only on arrest, and the breach of trust inherent in the claims, the sentencing judge's assessment that counts 3 and 4 were well above the middle range and moving towards the upper end was reasonably open.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted; leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The time in which to file a notice of application for leave to appeal against sentence is extended until 10 August 2020.' 'Leave to appeal is granted.' 'The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment