Kycel Pty Ltd Trading as ACA Design Consultants v Liverpool City Council [2009] NSWLEC 1218
As the application was lodged under LEP 2007 and not determined when LEP 2008 commenced, the savings clause applies: the application may be determined as if LEP 2008 had not commenced, taking into account the draft provisions of LEP 2008. The amended proposal complies with relevant standards, addresses access and amenity concerns, and satisfies zone objectives. Objections were insufficient to displace compliance with planning controls. Consent orders to grant development consent are appropriate.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Development Application Appeal / Judgment on Appeal With Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; consent orders made by agreement; development consent granted
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'multi Unit Housing' 'zoning' 'access' 'neighbourhood Character' 'amenity' 'consent Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Development Application Appeal / Judgment on Appeal With Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the development is prohibited under the R2 zone pursuant to LLEP 2008' 'Whether the development is consistent with the future character and built form of residential development in the area' 'Permissibility of direct access from Cowpasture Road' 'Site suitability in terms of impacts on future road works' 'Precedent' 'Landscaped areas' 'Public interest considerations']
Ratio Decidendi
As the application was lodged under LEP 2007 and not determined when LEP 2008 commenced, the savings clause applies: the application may be determined as if LEP 2008 had not commenced, taking into account the draft provisions of LEP 2008. The amended proposal complies with relevant standards, addresses access and amenity concerns, and satisfies zone objectives. Objections were insufficient to displace compliance with planning controls. Consent orders to grant development consent are appropriate.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; consent orders made by agreement; development consent granted
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development consent is granted for construction of 24 townhouses (16 x 3 bedroom, 8 x 4 bedroom), 54 car parking spaces, boundary fencing, landscaping at Lot 32 DP 866117, Cowpasture Road, Green Valley, subject to detailed conditions in Annexure A.' 'The exhibits may be returned except 1...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment