Colman v Dang [2022] NSWCATAP 126
The appellant failed to provide the required evidence and transcript to support her grounds of appeal, and the mould report did not meet the threshold for fresh evidence. The Tribunal’s calculation of the occupation fee and the compensation awards were correct. No error of law nor basis for leave to appeal was established, and leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kylie Colman; Appellant: Jon Colman; Respondent: Yong Bing Dang
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Residential Tenancy Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Appeals, Rent Reduction, Compensation for Repairs, Admission of Fresh Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kylie Colman
Appellant
Jon Colman
Appellant
Yong Bing Dang
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Residential Tenancy Appeal / Appeal Panel Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in its award of compensation for a leaking shower
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in calculating the occupation fee post-termination
- 3 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to provide the required evidence and transcript to support her grounds of appeal, and the mould report did not meet the threshold for fresh evidence. The Tribunal’s calculation of the occupation fee and the compensation awards were correct. No error of law nor basis for leave to appeal was established, and leave to appeal was refused and the appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- Leave to appeal refused.
- Appeal dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment