Giddins (nee Cooper and Ryan) v Ryan [2018] NSWSC 469
Witness evidence, including the plaintiff's evidence, could be adduced by affidavit because the plaintiff's affidavit had already been prepared and served, the defendant or his representative had long had the relevant material, the plaintiff had previously given evidence and been cross-examined in criminal proceedings, oral evidence would not materially assist credit issues given the passage of time, and affidavit evidence would facilitate the just, quick and cheap resolution of the real issues without injustice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Common Law Civil Proceeding Alleging Trespass to the Person Associated With Sexual Assault / Pre Trial Procedural Ruling on the Manner in Which Evidence Would Be Adduced at Trial and Compliance With a Statement of Issues Requirement
- Outcome
- Orders made relieving the defendant from the Statement of Issues requirement, permitting witness evidence by affidavit, and making costs of the day costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['affidavit Evidence' 'oral Evidence' 'statement of Issues' 'just, Quick and Cheap Resolution of Proceedings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Common Law Civil Proceeding Alleging Trespass to the Person Associated With Sexual Assault / Pre Trial Procedural Ruling on the Manner in Which Evidence Would Be Adduced at Trial and Compliance With a Statement of Issues Requirement
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether witness evidence, including the plaintiff's evidence, should be adduced by affidavit rather than orally at trial." 'Whether the defendant should be relieved from compliance with the requirement to provide a Statement of Issues in accordance with Appendix B of the Supreme Court Practice Note.']
Ratio Decidendi
Witness evidence, including the plaintiff's evidence, could be adduced by affidavit because the plaintiff's affidavit had already been prepared and served, the defendant or his representative had long had the relevant material, the plaintiff had previously given evidence and been cross-examined in criminal proceedings, oral evidence would not materially assist credit issues given the passage of time, and affidavit evidence would facilitate the just, quick and cheap resolution of the real issues without injustice.
Court Disposition
Orders made relieving the defendant from the Statement of Issues requirement, permitting witness evidence by affidavit, and making costs of the day costs in the cause.
Orders
- ['The defendant is relieved from compliance with the requirement to provide a Statement of Issues in accordance with Appendix B of the Supreme Court Practice Note.' 'Witness evidence, including that of the plaintiff, may be adduced by affidavit.' 'The costs of today will be costs in the cause.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment