KYLIE STEELE v IVAN STEELE [1992] NSWCA 243
The trial judge's award of general damages was so low as to justify intervention by the Court of Appeal. The plaintiff suffered ongoing disabilities and loss of enjoyment of activities. The Court substituted an award of $30,000 for general damages, split equally between past and future damages.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kylie Steele; Respondent: Ivan Steele
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 1992
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment set aside as to general damages; new award substituted; respondent to pay appellant's costs of appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Damages, Personal Injury, Assessment of Damages, Motor Vehicle Accident
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kylie Steele
Appellant
Ivan Steele
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the award of general damages to the plaintiff was inadequate given the injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident.
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's award of general damages was so low as to justify intervention by the Court of Appeal. The plaintiff suffered ongoing disabilities and loss of enjoyment of activities. The Court substituted an award of $30,000 for general damages, split equally between past and future damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment set aside as to general damages; new award substituted; respondent to pay appellant's costs of appeal.
Orders
- Judgment of Judge Gallen, except as to costs, set aside.
- Judgment entered for appellant in sum reflecting increased general damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment