Choi v Khan [2022] NSWCATAP 76
The Appeal Panel found that no error of law was established and leave to appeal should be refused, as the appellant failed to prove entitlement to a break fee at first instance or show that the decision regarding bond deductions was against the weight of evidence. The application to raise new grounds (such as the break fee) was barred, and the Tribunal's fact-finding was open on the evidence.
- Parties
- Appellant: Kyong Houan Choi; Respondent: Mohammad Ashraf Khan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Bond Claims, Break Fee, Appeals, Evidence Weight, Waiver of Break Fee
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kyong Houan Choi
Appellant
Mohammad Ashraf Khan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Determination of Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing a break fee claim by the landlord
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's decision not to allow further deductions from the bond for cleaning and repairs was against the weight of evidence
- 3 Whether the Tribunal gave inconsistent oral and written decisions
Ratio Decidendi
The Appeal Panel found that no error of law was established and leave to appeal should be refused, as the appellant failed to prove entitlement to a break fee at first instance or show that the decision regarding bond deductions was against the weight of evidence. The application to raise new grounds (such as the break fee) was barred, and the Tribunal's fact-finding was open on the evidence.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal is refused.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment