L Vogel & Son Pty Ltd v Anderson [1968] HCA 90

L Vogel & Son Pty Ltd v Anderson [1968] HCA 90

The definition of 'smuggling' under Customs Act 1901, s. 4 includes importation with intent to defraud the revenue, whether accomplished by concealment or fraudulent paperwork. Multiple separate offences may be charged for each act constituting an offence under the Act; penalties imposed were justified given the nature and extent of wrongdoing. Section 240 applies broadly to offences involving goods under s. 234.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Civil / Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; cross appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['smuggling' 'fraudulent Evasion of Duty' 'penalties Under Customs Act' 'false Invoices' 'false Entries']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether appellants were guilty of smuggling under s. 233(1)(a) of the Customs Act' 'Whether multiple offences can be charged in respect of each evasion of duty' 'Whether penalties imposed for smuggling were excessive' 'Whether s. 240 applies to offences under s. 234']

Ratio Decidendi

The definition of 'smuggling' under Customs Act 1901, s. 4 includes importation with intent to defraud the revenue, whether accomplished by concealment or fraudulent paperwork. Multiple separate offences may be charged for each act constituting an offence under the Act; penalties imposed were justified given the nature and extent of wrongdoing. Section 240 applies broadly to offences involving goods under s. 234.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; cross appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['Declarations in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 of the prayer of the statement of claim' 'Defendants convicted of all offences charged and of committing each offence with intent to defraud the revenue' 'Defendants to pay to the plaintiff penalties totalling $157,632' "Defendants to pay plaintiff's costs of the...