LAM v RHODES [1994] NSWCA 175
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed because within the court's discretion, the case is not appropriate for leave (notwithstanding the fact that dismissal does not prevent pursuit of an appeal as of right if available).
- Parties
- Plaintiff: LAM; Defendant: RHODES; Insurer's Representative: Mr Shore
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 1994
- Procedural Posture
- Motor Vehicle Accident Damages Assessment / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Motor Vehicle Accident, Damages Assessment, Leave to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAM
Plaintiff
RHODES
Defendant
Mr Shore
Insurer's Representative
Procedural Posture
Motor Vehicle Accident Damages Assessment / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted from District Court judgment assessing damages for motor vehicle accident injuries
- 2 Whether appeal lies as of right under District Court Act
Ratio Decidendi
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed because within the court's discretion, the case is not appropriate for leave (notwithstanding the fact that dismissal does not prevent pursuit of an appeal as of right if available).
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal be dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment