Doyle v Hunters Hill Council [2019] NSWLEC 1620
Both appeals were refused because the applicant did not provide sufficient, accurate and relevant information to allow the Court to be satisfied of the jurisdictional and merit requirements. For the BIC, extensive missing certifications and information about the quality, quantity and integrity of unauthorised works meant the Court could not be satisfied under ss 6.25 and 6.26 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the proposed orders would create uncertainty rather than justify issuing a certificate. For the DA, missing and inconsistent plans and absent detail about the pergola wall, driveway grades, earthworks, drainage, sewer design, stairs and landscaping meant the...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeals Concerning a Development Application and a Building Information Certificate Application / Hearing After Conciliation Was Terminated; Appeals Against Refusal/deemed Refusal
- Outcome
- Both appeals dismissed; Building Information Certificate application no. 2018/10 refused; Development Application 2018/1002 refused.
- Legal Topics
- ['unauthorised Building Works' 'insufficiency of Plans and Certification' 'stormwater Management and Drainage' 'earthworks' 'existing and Desired Future Character' 'visual Amenity' 'conditions of Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeals Concerning a Development Application and a Building Information Certificate Application / Hearing After Conciliation Was Terminated; Appeals Against Refusal/deemed Refusal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should direct issue of a Building Information Certificate for unauthorised works including a rear pergola, rear WC/laundry, front porch/verandah and front portico.' 'Whether development consent should be granted for demolition and reconstruction of an existing driveway, path and pergola wall and use of unauthorised works.' 'Whether insufficient and inaccurate plans, missing dimensions, missing drainage and sewer details, and absent certifications could be addressed by conditions or Court orders.' 'Whether the proposed development and unauthorised works were consistent with the existing and desired future character of Hunters Hill and had unacceptable visual amenity impacts.' 'Whether the Court could be satisfied of requirements concerning earthworks and stormwater management under the Hunters Hill Local Environmental Plan 2012.']
Ratio Decidendi
Both appeals were refused because the applicant did not provide sufficient, accurate and relevant information to allow the Court to be satisfied of the jurisdictional and merit requirements. For the BIC, extensive missing certifications and information about the quality, quantity and integrity of unauthorised works meant the Court could not be satisfied under ss 6.25 and 6.26 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and the proposed orders would create uncertainty rather than justify issuing a certificate. For the DA, missing and inconsistent plans and absent detail about the pergola wall, driveway grades, earthworks, drainage, sewer design, stairs and landscaping meant the...
Court Disposition
Both appeals dismissed; Building Information Certificate application no. 2018/10 refused; Development Application 2018/1002 refused.
Orders
- ['BIC Appeal 2019/78763: The appeal is dismissed.' 'BIC Appeal 2019/78763: Building Information Certificate application no. 2018/10 which seeks to regularise unauthorised works that include a rear pergola, rear WC/laundry, front porch/verandah, and front portico on Lot 16 DP 224608, also known as 3 Joly Parade...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment