Hamilton v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd & Stanwix v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd & Archer v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd & Henderson v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd [1998] IRCA 20

Hamilton v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd & Stanwix v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd & Archer v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd & Henderson v Australian Guarantee Corp Ltd [1998] IRCA 20

Although there was a valid operational reason for redundancy, the employer's selection process relied on performance-related appraisals and adverse impressions without giving the applicants the opportunity to respond or correct such perceptions; this lack of procedural fairness breached s 170DC, necessitating compensation to each applicant for the loss of chance to retain employment.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 June 1998
Procedural Posture
Motions for Review of Decisions of a Judicial Registrar / Judgment on Review
Outcome
Orders of the Judicial Registrar set aside; compensation awarded to applicants.
Legal Topics
['redundancy' 'unfair Dismissal' 'procedural Fairness' 'termination of Employment' 'compensation']
['industrial Law' 'employment Law'] ['redundancy' 'unfair Dismissal' 'procedural Fairness' 'termination of Employment' 'compensation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Motions for Review of Decisions of a Judicial Registrar / Judgment on Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the termination of the applicants' employment by Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd complied with s 170DE(1) and s 170DC of the Industrial Relations Act 1988" 'Whether procedural fairness was accorded during the redundancy selection process' 'Assessment of compensation for breach of procedural fairness']

Ratio Decidendi

Although there was a valid operational reason for redundancy, the employer's selection process relied on performance-related appraisals and adverse impressions without giving the applicants the opportunity to respond or correct such perceptions; this lack of procedural fairness breached s 170DC, necessitating compensation to each applicant for the loss of chance to retain employment.

Court Disposition

Orders of the Judicial Registrar set aside; compensation awarded to applicants.

Orders

  • ['Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd to pay compensation to Lance Hamilton in the sum of $2,800.' 'Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd to pay compensation to Brennan A Stanwix in the sum of $3,000.' 'Australian Guarantee Corporation Ltd to pay compensation to Dale Anthony Archer in the sum of $550.' 'Australian...