Schultz, Lancelot Franklin v Beldon, Edmund Michael & Ors [1983] FCA 328
In the particular circumstances of this case, including the applicant's reasonable reliance on union advice and a short delay for financial assistance, the extension of time is warranted despite general principles disfavoring delays for legal aid reasons.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lancelot Franklin Schultz; First Respondent: Edmund Michael Belden; First Respondent: Tan Hamish Gammage; First Respondent: John Stewart Fraser Bowan; Second Respondent: Ian Stanley Lincoln; Third Respondent: Robert William Cole; Third Respondent: Robert John Young; Third Respondent: John Vincent Monaghan
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 1983
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Extension of Time, Promotion Appeals, Public Service Employment Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lancelot Franklin Schultz
Applicant
Edmund Michael Belden
First Respondent
Tan Hamish Gammage
First Respondent
John Stewart Fraser Bowan
First Respondent
Ian Stanley Lincoln
Second Respondent
Robert William Cole
Third Respondent
Robert John Young
Third Respondent
John Vincent Monaghan
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time should be granted for lodging an application for judicial review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 in respect of a decision by a Promotions Appeal Committee, given a delay of 22 days.
Ratio Decidendi
In the particular circumstances of this case, including the applicant's reasonable reliance on union advice and a short delay for financial assistance, the extension of time is warranted despite general principles disfavoring delays for legal aid reasons.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted
Orders
- The time within which to lodge the application for an order of review be extended up to and including 6 September 1983.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment