Land Specialists Pty Ltd v Port Stephens Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1683
The Court had previously determined that it was appropriate to grant development consent subject to conditions, and after the parties filed agreed conditions the appeal was upheld and the development application was approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 November 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Ex Tempore Judgment and Agreed Conditions
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'subdivision for Residential Purposes' 'airport Noise' 'internal and External Amenity' 'public Interest' 'development Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Appeal / Final Orders Following Ex Tempore Judgment and Agreed Conditions
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for the subdivision of lots 4 and 5 in Deposited Plan 239141 known as 171 and 173 Richardson Road, Raymond Terrace subject to conditions.' 'Whether the subdivision for residential purposes near Newcastle airport affected by airport noise should be approved.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court had previously determined that it was appropriate to grant development consent subject to conditions, and after the parties filed agreed conditions the appeal was upheld and the development application was approved subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- ['The Appeal is upheld.' 'Development application number 16-2021-16-1 for the subdivision of land being lots 4 and 5 in Deposited Plan 239141 known as 171 and 173 Richardson Road, Raymond Terrace is determined by approval subject to the conditions in Annexure A.' 'Exhibits other than exhibits A, B, C and 2 to be...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment