Landcorp Australia Pty Ltd v Central Coast Council [2025] NSWLEC 1069
The consent authority's jurisdictional and statutory prerequisites for approval having been satisfied, and the parties having resolved previously contested issues through amendment and mediation, the Court upholds the appeal and grants development consent in accordance with the parties' agreement.
- Parties
- Applicant: Landcorp Australia Pty Ltd; Respondent: Central Coast Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1) / Final Judgment After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to agreed conditions. Costs to respondent.
- Legal Topics
- Development Applications, Biodiversity Assessment, Bush Fire Protection, Subdivision Consent, Tree Removal, Local Environmental Plan
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Landcorp Australia Pty Ltd
Applicant
Central Coast Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1) / Final Judgment After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the amended development application satisfies statutory requirements for biodiversity, vegetation, and bushfire assessment
- 2 Whether consent should be granted for a 53-lot subdivision with associated works
- 3 Sufficiency of expert reports and impact mitigation measures
Ratio Decidendi
The consent authority's jurisdictional and statutory prerequisites for approval having been satisfied, and the parties having resolved previously contested issues through amendment and mediation, the Court upholds the appeal and grants development consent in accordance with the parties' agreement.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Development consent granted subject to agreed conditions. Costs to respondent.
Orders
- The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs as agreed or assessed pursuant to section 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
- The appeal is upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment