Lane Cove Council v Ross [2012] NSWLEC 153
A prima facie case was established that the respondent breached the development consent and further unlawful building work was likely, warranting an interlocutory injunction until further order, with substituted service methods authorised due to difficulties with personal service.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lane Cove Council; Respondent: Raymond Ross
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunction granted; substituted service orders made; matter stood over.
- Legal Topics
- Building Work in Breach of Development Consent, Interlocutory Injunction, Substituted Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lane Cove Council
Applicant
Raymond Ross
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether building work was carried out in contravention of a development consent
- 2 Whether interlocutory relief should be granted to restrain further work
- 3 Appropriate method of service of court documents
Ratio Decidendi
A prima facie case was established that the respondent breached the development consent and further unlawful building work was likely, warranting an interlocutory injunction until further order, with substituted service methods authorised due to difficulties with personal service.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunction granted; substituted service orders made; matter stood over.
Orders
- The respondent is restrained from laying bricks or carrying out any building work at the second floor of 8 Bayview Street, Northwood until further order, subject to an undertaking as to damages.
- Copies of the summons, affidavit, and orders must be affixed at the premises, posted to PO Box 944 Lane Cove NSW 2066, and emailed to rossconsulting@optusnet.com.au.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment