Lane Cove Council v Chami (No 4) [2014] NSWLEC 89
In light of the evidence that Council officers had attempted to inspect the Premises, were refused entry by the respondent, and that the Council needed to serve a notice of motion seeking access-related interlocutory relief, it was appropriate to grant leave for substituted service in the specified manner.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Proceedings / Ex Parte Interlocutory Application for Orders for Substituted Service
- Outcome
- Orders for substituted service made; remainder of the motion listed before the Registrar.
- Legal Topics
- ['substituted Service' 'ex Parte Application' 'unauthorised Works' 'power of Entry']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Proceedings / Ex Parte Interlocutory Application for Orders for Substituted Service
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted leave to serve the notice of motion filed on 30 June 2014 and supporting affidavit on the respondent by substituted service.']
Ratio Decidendi
In light of the evidence that Council officers had attempted to inspect the Premises, were refused entry by the respondent, and that the Council needed to serve a notice of motion seeking access-related interlocutory relief, it was appropriate to grant leave for substituted service in the specified manner.
Court Disposition
Orders for substituted service made; remainder of the motion listed before the Registrar.
Orders
- ['The Court grants leave to the applicant to serve a copy of the notice of motion filed on 30 June 2014, the affidavit of Adrian Moore sworn on 27 June 2014 and these orders on the respondent by placing a sealed copy of the abovementioned notice of motion and affidavit in a clear plastic envelope and affixing same...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment