LANG v KIRKNESS [1994] NSWCA 180

LANG v KIRKNESS [1994] NSWCA 180

On proper construction, the consent orders did not permit Kirkness to extend works beyond the stipulated six-metre width of the easement; as such, the contravention was by Kirkness, not Lang, and thus Lang's actions were not a repudiation of the settlement.

Parties
Appellant: Lang; Respondent: Kirkness
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
16 August 1994
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal upheld. Orders below set aside. Proceedings dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Construction of Consent Orders, Right of Way, Repudiation of Compromise, Variation of Easements
Property Law Easements Construction of Consent Orders Right of Way Repudiation of Compromise Variation of Easements

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lang

Appellant

Kirkness

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the conduct of Lang constituted a repudiation of a compromise embodied in consent orders
  2. 2 Proper construction of the consent orders relating to the easement and repairs

Ratio Decidendi

On proper construction, the consent orders did not permit Kirkness to extend works beyond the stipulated six-metre width of the easement; as such, the contravention was by Kirkness, not Lang, and thus Lang's actions were not a repudiation of the settlement.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld. Orders below set aside. Proceedings dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Appeal upheld.
  • Orders below set aside.