Heuving v Dirluck Pty Ltd t/as Cut Price Deli Miranda and anor [2001] NSWCC 108
Costs incurred after 20 March 2000 shall be apportioned between respondents pro rata to the quantum of the awards, with 90% payable by the first respondent and 10% by the second respondent. Costs incurred up to and including 20 March 2000 are payable by the first respondent alone.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation / Final Determination of Costs Apportionment Post Settlement
- Outcome
- Costs apportioned between respondents. Compensation agreed and specified.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs Apportionment' 'quantum of Compensation' 'joinder of Respondent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation / Final Determination of Costs Apportionment Post Settlement
Legal Issues
- 1 ['How should costs payable to the applicant be apportioned between two respondents following settlement?' 'Is the second respondent liable for costs incurred prior to being joined?']
Ratio Decidendi
Costs incurred after 20 March 2000 shall be apportioned between respondents pro rata to the quantum of the awards, with 90% payable by the first respondent and 10% by the second respondent. Costs incurred up to and including 20 March 2000 are payable by the first respondent alone.
Court Disposition
Costs apportioned between respondents. Compensation agreed and specified.
Orders
- ["First respondent to pay applicant's costs incurred up to and including 20 March 2000." "First respondent to pay 90% of applicant's costs incurred since 20 March 2000." "Second respondent to pay 10% of applicant's costs incurred since 20 March 2000." 'First respondent to pay lump sum compensation of $20,000 and s...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment