McPHAIL V. MITTON 4/1940
McPhail was guilty of misfeasance as director in directing and permitting company funds to be paid for liabilities not incurred by Lasscock's Nurseries Ltd., and such payments were not in its interest but for the benefit of Lyons and Leader Ltd. (in which McPhail had a personal interest); these payments were ultra vires and not authorised under the company's powers.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lasscock's Nurseries Limited (in liquidation); Appellant: McPhail; Respondent: Mitton
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 September 1940
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Director's Duties, Misfeasance, Breach of Trust, Ultra Vires, Company Payments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lasscock's Nurseries Limited (in liquidation)
Applicant
McPhail
Appellant
Mitton
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payments made by McPhail as director of Lasscock's Nurseries Ltd. were misfeasance and breach of trust
- 2 Whether Lasscock's Nurseries Ltd. had liability for payments made to S.H. and P.F. Leader and Lyons and Leader Ltd.
- 3 Whether payments were ultra vires of the company and its directors
Ratio Decidendi
McPhail was guilty of misfeasance as director in directing and permitting company funds to be paid for liabilities not incurred by Lasscock's Nurseries Ltd., and such payments were not in its interest but for the benefit of Lyons and Leader Ltd. (in which McPhail had a personal interest); these payments were ultra vires and not authorised under the company's powers.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- McPhail to pay £2,770-14-7 and £50 to the liquidator of Lasscock's Nurseries Ltd.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment