Lateral Estate Pty Limited v Georges River Council [2019] NSWLEC 1082
The agreement between the parties to grant development consent, subject to conditions, addresses all jurisdictional prerequisites under planning law, and is a decision the Court is empowered to make. The Court is therefore required to make orders in those terms under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 / Conciliation Conference Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; costs order made.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'consent Orders' 'jurisdictional Prerequisites' 'land Contamination' 'noise Impact' 'local Environmental Plan']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 / Conciliation Conference Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the revised development plans address Council's original contentions against approval" 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites under SEPP Infrastructure and SEPP 55 are satisfied']
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement between the parties to grant development consent, subject to conditions, addresses all jurisdictional prerequisites under planning law, and is a decision the Court is empowered to make. The Court is therefore required to make orders in those terms under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; costs order made.
Orders
- ['The applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans referred to in Annexure A.' "The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away pursuant to s 8.15(3) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in regard to the agreed amount of $13,000 within 28 days of the date of the signed...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment