Mayo v W & K Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 155

Mayo v W & K Holdings (NSW) Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2015] NSWCA 155

Because the earlier appeal established that unpaid bank fees of $4,800 were owing to Ms Mayo, and because the claimed prejudgment interest of $612.36 was supported by Ms Mayo's submissions and was not opposed by any respondent submission, it was appropriate to enter judgment for $5,412.36 and to order that the judgment take effect on 8 May 2015.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 June 2015
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders Concerning Prejudgment Interest / On the Papers in the Court of Appeal After Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Judgment entered for the appellant against the respondents in the sum of $5,412.36, taking effect on 8 May 2015.
Legal Topics
['judgment and Orders' 'prejudgment Interest' 'effective Date of Judgment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Consequential Orders Concerning Prejudgment Interest / On the Papers in the Court of Appeal After Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether judgment should be entered for unpaid bank fees and prejudgment interest owing to the appellant.' 'Whether the judgment should take effect on 8 May 2015.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the earlier appeal established that unpaid bank fees of $4,800 were owing to Ms Mayo, and because the claimed prejudgment interest of $612.36 was supported by Ms Mayo's submissions and was not opposed by any respondent submission, it was appropriate to enter judgment for $5,412.36 and to order that the judgment take effect on 8 May 2015.

Court Disposition

Judgment entered for the appellant against the respondents in the sum of $5,412.36, taking effect on 8 May 2015.

Orders

  • ['In addition to the orders made on 8 May 2015, judgment for the appellant against the respondents in the sum of $5,412.36.' 'This judgment takes effect on 8 May 2015.']