Hoban v Mathieson [No 2] [2002] NSWCA 232
Despite the exceptional circumstance of an aborted trial, costs properly incurred should be paid by the plaintiff in accordance with the rule following rejection of a compromise, and restitution for overpaid judgment sum should be made with interest as indemnity.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Judgment Orders
- Outcome
- Orders made
- Legal Topics
- ['order for Costs After Offer of Compromise' 'restitution for Overpayment' 'interest Pursuant to Supreme Court Act' 'aborted Trial Costs']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Judgment Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether costs should follow the offer of compromise under DCR Pt 39A r 25 subr 6' 'Appropriate restitution and interest for overpayment made under former judgment' 'The treatment of costs arising from an aborted trial']
Ratio Decidendi
Despite the exceptional circumstance of an aborted trial, costs properly incurred should be paid by the plaintiff in accordance with the rule following rejection of a compromise, and restitution for overpaid judgment sum should be made with interest as indemnity.
Court Disposition
Orders made
Orders
- ['Plaintiff to pay costs of the aborted trial.' 'Restitution for overpayment of $139,349.03 plus interest of $10,689.03 pursuant to s 94 of the Supreme Court Act for period from 17 October 2001 to 10 July 2002.' 'Liberty to apply to English DCJ for certificate under s 6A(1)(c) of Suitors Fund Act.' 'Short stay of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment