Stanley -v- Wellington Bowling Club Limited [2003] NSWADT 139
The Tribunal found that the severity of suspensions imposed by the Club was directly related to whether the member had previously appeared before the Board and been suspended for inappropriate behaviour. The only members suspended for 7 years were the applicant, Robert Don and Louise Clark, and Don and Clark were not Aboriginal but had also previously been suspended. There was no evidence that the applicant was treated less favourably on the ground of race.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Race Discrimination Complaint Concerning a Registered Club / Principal Matter Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['race Discrimination' 'registered Clubs' 'suspension of Club Membership' 'less Favourable Treatment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Race Discrimination Complaint Concerning a Registered Club / Principal Matter Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Club treated the applicant less favourably than it treated a non-Aboriginal person in the same or similar circumstances.' 'If the Club treated the applicant less favourably, whether that treatment was on the ground of race.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the severity of suspensions imposed by the Club was directly related to whether the member had previously appeared before the Board and been suspended for inappropriate behaviour. The only members suspended for 7 years were the applicant, Robert Don and Louise Clark, and Don and Clark were not Aboriginal but had also previously been suspended. There was no evidence that the applicant was treated less favourably on the ground of race.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed
Orders
- ['That the complaint be dismissed.' 'No order as to costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment