Tahere v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 814
The appellant's removal from Australia at her own request pursuant to s 199 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) brought her within the definition of a 'behaviour concern non-citizen' under s 5(1)(d), which lawfully precluded the grant of a Special Category Visa under s 32(2)(a)(ii); thus, the delegate and primary judge made no error in law.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['special Category Visa Refusal' 'behaviour Concern Non Citizen Definition' 'judicial Review' 'removal Under Migration Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the appellant was properly classified as a 'behaviour concern non-citizen' under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 5(1) due to having been removed from Australia at her own request under s 199, and therefore ineligible for a Special Category Visa"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's removal from Australia at her own request pursuant to s 199 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) brought her within the definition of a 'behaviour concern non-citizen' under s 5(1)(d), which lawfully precluded the grant of a Special Category Visa under s 32(2)(a)(ii); thus, the delegate and primary judge made no error in law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs to be assessed if not agreed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment